Item Records

This page shows all the information we have about this item. Both the institution that physically holds this item, and RRN members have contributed the knowledge on this page. You’re looking at the item record provided by the holding institution. If you scroll further down the page, you’ll see the information from RRN members, and can share your own knowledge too.

The RRN processes the information it receives from each institution to make it more readable and easier to search. If you’re doing in-depth research on this item, be sure to take a look at the Data Source tab to see the information exactly as it was provided by the institution.

These records are easy to share because each has a unique web address. You can copy and paste the location from your browser’s address bar into an email, word document, or chat message to share this item with others.

  • Data
  • Data Source

This information was automatically generated from data provided by The Burke: University of Washington. It has been standardized to aid in finding and grouping information within the RRN. Accuracy and meaning should be verified from the Data Source tab.

Description

Original CatalogNotes & References: CROSS MENDSDates Range: Mark/Pattern: Modern (less than 50 years old):

Collection Owner

Held in trust for the US Bureau of Reclamation, Upper Columbia Area Office

Geographical Search Terms

Eastern Washington Kittitas County Middle Columbia North America Pacific Northwest Plateau Washington State Western United States

Credit Line

Courtesy of the US Bureau of Reclamation

Notes

Catalog number inventoried by USBR on June 13, 2006.

Dimension Details

Original Catalog: Metric: MNA: 1 Count Details: Frag #: 1 Comp #: Original Count: 1 Burke Museum Count: 3 Burke Museum Count Notes: Although the original count is listed as 1, there are actually 3 individual fragments in this bag. Initially I assumed this may be the result of the specimen being broken into 3 fragments since it was originally analyzed, however it appears that these three fragments do not crossmend to form a single specimen. So even though these fragments appear to be from the same original object, I do not believe that they formed a complete specimen when originally analyzed.

Item History

With an account, you can ask other users a question about this item. Request an Account

With an account, you can submit information about this item and have it visible to all users and institutions on the RRN. Request an Account

Similar Items