Two shell samples. Removed from level bag 5 as a candidate for testing by Beta Analytic. Sample was not selected for testing, but was assigned sample number 280S04 The data for samples that were tested was included in the Royalty Research Fund project organized by Dr. Julie Stein.

One shell Sample. Removed from Level bag 146 as a candidate for testing by Beta Analytic. Sample was not selected for testing, but was assigned sample number 280S01 The data for samples that were tested was included in the Royalty Research Fund project organized by Dr. Julie Stein. Sample was returned to Level Bag 146. K. Lutz 9/18/2009

One shell sample. Removed from level bag 4 as a candidate for testing by Beta Analytic. Sample was not selected for testing, but was assigned sample number 280S05 The data for samples that were tested was included in the Royalty Research Fund project organized by Dr. Julie Stein. Sample returned to original level bag unanalyzed. K. Lutz 9/22/2009

Two Shell Samples. Removed from Level bag 88 as a candidate for testing by Beta Analytic. Sample was not selected for testing, but was assigned sample number 278S02 The data for samples that were tested was included in the Royalty Research Fund project organized by Dr. Julie Stein. Bag is labeled "Sea Urchin - stronglyocentrotus spp." Sample returned to level bag 88 unanalyzed. K. Lutz 09/18/2009

One shell sample. Removed from level bag 6 as a candidate for testing by Beta Analytic. Sample was not selected for testing, but was assigned sample number 278S06 The data for samples that were tested was included in the Royalty Research Fund project organized by Dr. Julie Stein.

One shell samples. Removed from level bag #39 (formerly level bag #37, but see below) as a candidate for testing by Beta Analytic. Sample was not selected for testing, but was assigned sample number 278S03 The data for samples that were tested was included in the Royalty Research Fund project organized by Dr. Julie Stein. Sample was returned to level bag 37 unanalyzed. K. Lutz 09/18/2009 The correct level bag number from which this sample was removed is: 45SJ278/LB39. Due to a research project (Royalty Research Fund, PI: J. Stein, 1999), some level bags from this site were assigned catalog numbers prior to receipt of the field bag inventories. The field notes had apparently been borrowed by former curator Dr. Robert Greengo, and were not returned to the Burke until 2002. In 2009-10, the level bags were re-cataloged and assigned their original field bag number. However, the C-14 samples removed from the erroneously-cataloged levels bags that were analyzed for the research project maintain their incorrect level bag reference due to the documentation and publications that resulted from this research. L.Phillips, 1/5/2010.

One shell sample. Removed from level bag #26 (formerly level bag #23, but see below) as a candidate for testing by Beta Analytic. Sample was not selected for testing, but was assigned sample number 278S01 The data for samples that were tested was included in the Royalty Research Fund project organized by Dr. Julie Stein. Sample returned to level bag 23 unanalyzed. K. Lutz 09/18/2009 The correct level bag number from which this sample was removed is: 45SJ278/LB26. Due to a research project (Royalty Research Fund, PI: J. Stein, 1999), some level bags from this site were assigned catalog numbers prior to receipt of the field bag inventories. The field notes had apparently been borrowed by former curator Dr. Robert Greengo, and were not returned to the Burke until 2002. In 2009-10, the level bags were re-cataloged and assigned their original field bag number. However, the C-14 samples removed from the erroneously-cataloged levels bags that were analyzed for the research project maintain their incorrect level bag reference due to the documentation and publications that resulted from this research. L.Phillips, 1/5/2010.

One shell sample. Removed from level bag #75 (formerly level bag #67, but see below) as a candidate for testing by Beta Analytic. Sample was not selected for testing, but was assigned sample number 278S05 The data for samples that were tested was included in the Royalty Research Fund project organized by Dr. Julie Stein. Sample was returned to level bag 75 (formerly 67) unanalyzed. K. Lutz 09/18/2009 The correct level bag number from which this sample was removed is: 45SJ278/LB75. Due to a research project (Royalty Research Fund, PI: J. Stein, 1999), some level bags from this site were assigned catalog numbers prior to receipt of the field bag inventories. The field notes had apparently been borrowed by former curator Dr. Robert Greengo, and were not returned to the Burke until 2002. In 2009-10, the level bags were re-cataloged and assigned their original field bag number. However, the C-14 samples removed from the erroneously-cataloged levels bags that were analyzed for the research project maintain their incorrect level bag reference due to the documentation and publications that resulted from this research. L.Phillips, 1/5/2010.

Two shell samples. Removed from level bag #27 (formerly level bag #24, but see below) as a candidate for testing by Beta Analytic. Sample was not selected for testing, but was assigned sample number 278S02 The data for samples that were tested was included in the Royalty Research Fund project organized by Dr. Julie Stein. Sample was returned to level bag 24 unanalyzed. K. Lutz 09/18/2009 The correct level bag number from which this sample was removed is: 45SJ278/LB27. Due to a research project (Royalty Research Fund, PI: J. Stein, 1999), some level bags from this site were assigned catalog numbers prior to receipt of the field bag inventories. The field notes had apparently been borrowed by former curator Dr. Robert Greengo, and were not returned to the Burke until 2002. In 2009-10, the level bags were re-cataloged and assigned their original field bag number. However, the C-14 samples removed from the erroneously-cataloged levels bags that were analyzed for the research project maintain their incorrect level bag reference due to the documentation and publications that resulted from this research. L.Phillips, 1/5/2010.

Two shell samples. Removed from level bag #25 (formerly level bag #22, but see below) as a candidate for testing by Beta Analytic. Sample was not selected for testing, but was assigned sample number 278506 The data for samples that were tested was included in the Royalty Research Fund project organized by Dr. Julie Stein. The correct level bag number from which this sample was removed is: 45SJ278/LB25. Due to a research project (Royalty Research Fund, PI: J. Stein, 1999), some level bags from this site were assigned catalog numbers prior to receipt of the field bag inventories. The field notes had apparently been borrowed by former curator Dr. Robert Greengo, and were not returned to the Burke until 2002. In 2009-10, the level bags were re-cataloged and assigned their original field bag number. However, the C-14 samples removed from the erroneously-cataloged levels bags that were analyzed for the research project maintain their incorrect level bag reference due to the documentation and publications that resulted from this research. L.Phillips, 1/5/2010.